Mother Jones - Latest Comments in Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Steve B — Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:32:59 -0000

NINE years later, and a Google search for "santorum" still produces the same result. I guess Rick doesn't mind too much after all.

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Lari Dabio — Wed, 23 May 2018 13:36:34 -0000

I'm not sure how gays admitting that the type of sex they enjoy leading to a mixture of "blood and feaces" on their penises is supposed to make me or the majority of people be supportive of them or think of their lifestyle as normal.

Whatever floats their boat I guess. These are the people who deny gay bowel syndrome as "homophobia" but it all catches up to them in the end along with rectal ulcers, hemorrhoids and so much more. That Dan Savage is offended by truth reveals his insecurities like the insecurities he has over bisexual people.

Ah well, who cares in the end? Gays are their own worse enemies and will be continued to be seen as clowns until they stop acting as such and can have a personal identity without thinking that being gay is all they are and solely identifying by that one label.

I doubt things will change. Now, in 2018, they're trying to force gay men in wigs and hormones on society as "women" but thankfully we've had enough of the LGBT circus and even those on the left are saying no.

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Lari Dabio — Wed, 23 May 2018 13:26:49 -0000

"I do agree with you that a lot of the world's problems are caused by religion"

Such as?

"Religious people disagree with my lifestyle"

Yep just like meat eaters disagree with veganism but that's not a "problems" and most problems we see occurring today in the world stem from fascist leftists trying to censor freedom of speech through violence and witch hunting.

What Dan Savage did here was merely a foreshadowing of what the leftist movement would later become and if he doesn't like people critizing his lifestyle perhaps he shouldn't boast that his gay sex often leads to him having s*** and blood on his penis and trying to glorify and normalise it.

I reckon he's mentally ill like most Democrats who ironically care more about what people do in their private time than the religious right. Yet he (like you) wonder why people do not support you or mock you. It's because you try to force your views and lifestyle down people's throats and unless that changes, you'll never be accepted.

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Lari Dabio — Wed, 23 May 2018 13:19:23 -0000

Democrats are the ones always talking and obsessing over homosexuality, so do all you openly "proud" gays, clearly it is an issue for you otherwise you wouldn't talk about your sexuality every second or use it as your sole identification like hypocritical bigots like Dan Savage does.

When we tell you to shut up, you cry homophobia and then begin ranting more and more about your love for gay sex and then you deluded morons wonder why the world still dislikes you. Hint: it's not because of religion, it's due to your obnoxious behaviour, preachiness and perverse activities at pride events which embarrass all the ordinary people of the LGBT community.

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

bigcrazewolf — Mon, 01 Feb 2016 19:58:28 -0000

santorum (san-TOR-um) n.

1. The frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter

that is sometimes the by-product of anal sex.

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Pat Raymond — Fri, 15 Jan 2016 06:26:08 -0000

I find this situation from Bi men extraordinary in its consistency. It reminds me of how people born deaf who choose to get cochlear implants are then treated by the Deaf community, or blacks who lighten their skin. "Traitors" they are labeled. For what, actually exercising the right to choose?!

I have this thought experiment: say there was a poor teen girl who got pregnant out of wedlock, and she had to give her triplets up for adoption. They are identical, and all bi-sexually oriented, but of course you can't tell with babies.
Each is adopted by very different families. One girl is adopted by a very orthodox, classically liberal, G.K. Chesterton type of complete thinker. He has very out of the box economic idea, but is very loyal, and highly educated in Catholic values and ideals. She grows to be a well rounded thinker, who challenges those around her, but kindly, and thinks well of everyone, even her enemies. She is compassionate, but wise and patient. She feels, then, her faith put to the test when she realized one day that she feels a deep attraction for her best friend, a girl also. She becomes disturbed and confused, especially since she had been strongly attracted to several boys in JR. High. Naturally, she is saving herself for marriage, and decided not to pursue dating until graduation, so she attended a girls school instead. There, another girl, a secret lesbian picks up on this, and tries to entice her, assuming that she is one as well. Confused, and having a crisis of faith, she confesses to the priest and he suggests she go on a retreat. While there, she meets a boy, also on retreat for other issues, and falls in love with him. Assuming the attraction for girls had been a test of faith, she now concludes she had passed, and put it behind her. " I am not gay", she tells herself with relief. That she might be Bi never even crosses her mind.

Sister two ends up in a family that...SEEMS...conservative and traditional in every way. To the outside world, at least. But the most appalling hypocrisies are a day to day routine behind closed doors, a lot like Spacy's character in "House of Cards". Adopting her was mostly a publicity stunt to gain influence as "compassionate conservatives". But they dump her on a maid, and ignore her most of the time, except when she is useful for appearances. She is neglected, even as she lives in a nice home, has lots of toys, good food, even so, she is neglected. Lonely, and unable to connect to her peers, she is surprised and happy when her dad starts paying more and more attention to her as she grows older. He takes her to all sorts of places, fun places, but only the two of them, gradually working his way to the moment he molests her. She had taken an interest in Sunday school up to then, trying to find comfort in God and faith. So when he attempts to seduce her, she resists, beliving it wrong. She is not stupid, as he had seemed to think, having secretly disdained her as "white trash" like her biological mother seemed to be. He only really noticed her as she grew more and more beautiful. He was outraged that she would say no after he had been so "nice" to her. He rapes her, then and there.
This betrayal steadily compounds as she realizes that she has no one to turn to. Her mother doesn't care, theirs was a marriage of convenience. The maid, and who she regardes as her "real" mother, deep down, cares, but is helpless to do anything about it. Worst of all is the preacher, who refuses to believe her, or acts like it, out of fear of her father's influence.
He rapes her regularly, usually following an elaborate date, as if all was normal, just a dad and daughter out on the town. Her hate grows into a nameless thing, glowing hot in the depths of her soul. Then, suddenly, he up and loses interest in her, and sends her to an obscure boarding school in the middle of nowhere. There, in the showers, she sees other girls naked for the first time. A rebellious lesbian catches on and seduces her, and they fall in love. One day, they run away together, and over several years become part of a group of militant, ultra feminist, anti man bull dykes. Vasilating between atheism and various new age spirituality, she has completely turned against Christianity, and fantasizes about castrating men in general, and her rich "father" in particular. That she might be Bi is even further from her mind then her unknown sister.

Girl three is adopted by a single mother, who has one other child. She is a free spirit, kind, and sort of a Hindu hippie. She makes a good living from home, and homeschools. She teaches her children to explore their world and be wary of the gods, but not in an imperious sense. All very individualized, really. Needless to say, this triplet has little trouble figuring out that she is Bi, and vigorously dates both boys and girls throughout her teens.

Now, who is what orientation? Nurture naturally must play a bigger role in a Bi person's life, and this tends to please conservatives and disturbs liberals, when they think about it at all. Conservatives want to teach chastity as an ideal that contributes to potential salvation of souls, which includes self control, and among fundamentalists in particular, a notion that being gay is a choice. When you think about it, that sort of Christian really believes that EVERYONE is Bi. Too bad we aren't, then there would be no stupid arguments regarding "changing" existing orientation, only persuasion of ideas, and more importantly, universal choice. I say this as a Catholic myself, struggling to control my desires, not that a nerd like me has many opportunities to sin in that way.

Anyway, what if the "lesbian" girl met a man who struck her as different somehow? Perhaps he does something incredibly kind or heroic that breaks through the barriers and rage she had built up, reminding her of fantasies she had as a girl about a prince rescuing her that she had forgotten, and to everyone's shock, she falls in love with him. This sort of thing could explain those "traitors" that seem to turn straight, out of the blue. Its probably not so elaborate a background, in most cases. She or he simply never met an opposite that was their type, until years later, is all. Being Bi does not mean you are automatically a orgy crazy swinger, a baseless stereotype. Most want monogamous relationships, like most people. I would suggest that inherently promiscuous people are rarer then any orientation itself. It is an acquired fetish, and fetishes can be gotten over, albeit with difficulty, but you choose to start smoking and can ultimately choose to stop, however long it takes. You can't will yourself to have a genetic resistance to cancer, however. You are either born with it, or you aren't, and a smoker won't know for sure until he dies.

Now suppose the "Straight" girl is happily married for years, and has several kids until her husband dies suddenly. Lonely and overwhelmed, a neighbor offers to help while she goes back to work. They find themselves growing closer, to the mother's shock, desire growing from grief and loneliness.

Whether or not pride is a sin, it is a self destructive weakness. That is my skeptical dad's philosophy in a nutshell. He can't stand the primadonas most skeptics have become these days, so he prefers the company of believers. Pride is always more trouble the it is worth, causing division and unforgiveness. Why be proud of being gay or deaf or mauve with purple poka dots? There is nothing inherently cultural about any of that, and separate culture only arises from them as an adaptive measure. But, why be proud? Just as if I were deaf I would be humble enough to get an implant, if I were gay, and it was medically possible, I would change my orientation, not to become straight, but to become Bi. Then I could REALLY choose. Straights, to be fair, should ideally do the same, but they would never have the pressure to do so, to need to choose between pride or humility in an orientation context. Some straights claim to be "proud to be straight" but such weak pride can never achieve the potency of the "underdog" perception. But pride in either is absurd, not because of sex or sin, but because pride is always absurd. Respect and pride are as different as a gold coin is from the Golden calf. They are made from the raw ore of instinctive dignity, but one is a useful tool and the other a false god that has no life in it, yet men waste their lives to it. So here is to a life of humble choice.

🍷

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Eddie P Elfman — Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:39:29 -0000

This is so disgusting that I find it hard to conceive how anyone who would think such a thing up could be considered 'mainstream'.

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

teenygozer — Sun, 20 Sep 2015 18:58:02 -0000

I actually think that the thing that gets these gay Republican dudes off is self-hatred, humiliation, and guilt. If everyone accepts gay marriage and doesn't think twice about gay people any more than they'd think about heterosexuals, it will ruin their enjoyment.

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Michael C — Thu, 28 May 2015 08:07:36 -0000

Oh, but it hurts their feelings when we call them meanies !
Maybe we should all just go back in the closet so they don't get their panties in a bunch !

Or, better yet, THEY can go live in the closet with the moth balls so they don't have to see Equality like just got voted for in Ireland, by a bunch of Catholics, for the right to marriage for Gays !

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Michael C — Wed, 27 May 2015 16:45:19 -0000

Actually Susan, it is a very political issue as these bigots use the LGBT community as a wedge issue in their fight to get elected. They pass legislation to deny us equal rights and denigrate us to any who will listen and vote for them because of their anti-gay stance.

You say to :

"Try showing the religious right the plethora of evidence that their religion is all nonsense and you will begin to see peace and love and acceptance in the world."

I think this has been happening at least since the sexual revolution of the 60's and if you think trying to talk sense to these people will make the world a more peaceful and loving place you're delusional.

I do agree with you that a lot of the world's problems are caused by religion and I'd be the first in line to vote for you if you were able to run on a platform of banning religious intolerance by any religion.
Good luck with that !

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Michael C — Wed, 27 May 2015 16:34:53 -0000

See Alex Giger's comment (2 down from this one) for the answer to your question !

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

generic — Wed, 27 May 2015 14:54:42 -0000

They have nothing right and neither do you, just more vitriol of what you accuse the other party of doing. Both parties have been caught with their pants down, all the time. Not a political issue at all. Both parties are corrupt. The fact that you think that the liberals are any better is proof of your own ignorance. I have many reasons for not being a conservative but this kind of intolerant hubris is why I will not be a so called liberal. If you believe at all in freedom then you allow others to have a different opinion without attacking them personally. I believe that gays have the same rights as straights but I feel no need to lower myself to the venomous level of the likes of you. Their are plenty of liberals who still believe in the nonsense of that mythological holy book. It is religion that is the root of all evil and it is accepted by both parties. Instead of creating a wall of hate between the parties with your personal attacks you might grow up someday and learn that you attract more with honey than vinegar. Try showing the religious right the plethora of evidence that their religion is all nonsense and you will begin to see peace and love and acceptance in the world. But then you'll have to find something else to do with all of that venomous hatred you so love to spew.

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Michael C — Wed, 27 May 2015 14:04:53 -0000

I think I'll Google Bomb Santorum when ever I get on the computer. Gotta keep that name recognition going !

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Michael C — Wed, 27 May 2015 14:03:22 -0000

Well said, Fred !

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Michael C — Wed, 27 May 2015 13:47:34 -0000

You & Kimber got it right all over the place. I just saw a list of all kinds of GOPer's who've been caught with their pants down, most literally !

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Zootalaws — Sun, 12 Apr 2015 21:33:45 -0000

Trawling through three year old posts? Nothing better or more topical to do?

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Rose McFrog — Sat, 11 Apr 2015 16:25:29 -0000

I love it when RWNJ s try to be clever.

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Rose McFrog — Sat, 11 Apr 2015 16:19:27 -0000

Twice.

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Rose McFrog — Sat, 11 Apr 2015 16:16:48 -0000

Hasn't happened in thousands of years. Can't say the same for backward thinking political parties.

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Darius Thedreux — Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:16:21 -0000

LMFAO!

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Darius Thedreux — Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:10:27 -0000

People like you are the reason the rest of the world looks at us like petulant little trust fund children's with the IQs of tree sap. Get a few facts straight before you ramble on. First off - and GOD where do I begin - go back to school and learn a few things before you open your trap. There is no biological reason to molestation, otherwise it'd be a simple fix and off they go. Give them a pill like a diabetic and no more child molestations. Hell, while we're at it, just give the damn pills everyone on the planet and we'll eradicate it overnight. So, do us all a favor, and fall off that very high horse of yours.

Secondly, seriously? You really think saying you've worked with and known homosexuals is excuse that you aren't a dick? I've worked with and known spousal abusers, but that doesn't mean I like the bastards.

Lastly, just....shut up. People like you who hold your nose in the air and pretend that they know everything will be the downfall of this country. One of your kind will press the button to start a nuclear war one day and that'll be that. All in the name of your God.

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Darius Thedreux — Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:56:47 -0000

Suck a nugget, douche. If you want to preach tolerance, then let's go ahead and talk equality. Right now, your defense of that frothy anal seepage is akin to our founding fathers defending slavery because it was as it should always have been. Times change, as we as a country grow and prosper. If you want to defend those who would strip away human rights or pretend that sexuality is some sort of choice that can be made at the drop of a hat, you are as big of a bigot as most conservatives I have ever met. Tell you what - let's strip away any and all government rights and privileges marriage has ever given. No more tax breaks, no more preferential insurance rates - nada. Lets make marriage a "sacred" state that is only recognized within the confines of a church. That'll solve all the problems right there. No one will ever have to defend or attack the concept of gay marriage ever again, because there will be nothing that either side gets for it. It'd be as it was always meant to be - a commitment of both spirit and body to a life partner without any governmental entities regulating or approving of it.

But as long as bigoted douchbags like you and Santorum are around, then nothing will ever really be fair. So go ahead, pretend like failure to support human rights is the same as choosing whether to like a Big Mac or Whopper. You're no better than slaveholders or the Nazis at the camps who only did as they were told because their country told them to. Here's to hoping you choke on a cock. Cheers.

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Proud2bfromtheUSA — Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:59:54 -0000

Interesting how we are considered self loathing but you guys seem to think the most effective insult is to claim that the insultee is the very thing you claim is normal. Me personally as a Bisexual man know how vile you guys are to anyone that doesn't follow your prescribed dogma. Why would anyone choose to associate with gays. G0y seems the more natural choice for same sex attracted men.

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Proud2bfromtheUSA — Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:55:55 -0000

Hmm extortion and filth is how the gay community want to be thought of. This is why I chose the g0y label years ago and abhorred the gay label of course as a bisexual man I was constantly vilified and dismissed by the gays so you gays can have the bed you have made it is quite filthy I must say.

Re: Rick Santorum's Anal Sex Problem

Joseph Incredulous Huggy — Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:41:39 -0000

DEFINITION:
SANTORUM

Pronunciation: san-TOR-um
Function: noun

1. The frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the by-product of anal sex.